Sy Castle v. M. Ramirez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 30, 201008-56435California395 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 30 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SY LEE CASTLE, No. 08-56435

Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 3:08-cv-00347-DMS-POR

v.

MEMORANDUM *

M. RAMIREZ, Correctional Nurse; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2010 **

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Sy Lee Castle, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

rgs/Research deliberate indifference to serious medical needs and equal protection violations.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.