Hawthorne Savings v. Reliance Insurance

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 12, 200603-55548California12,714 words

Opinion

Opinion

Berzon 634 HAWTHORNE SAVINGS v. RELIANCE INSURANCE, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HAWTHORNE SAVINGS F.S.B.; 

HAWTHORNE FINANCIAL

CORPORATION, No. 03-55548 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.  D.C. No.

CV-99-13119-

RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF DT(AJW)

ILLINOIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

HAWTHORNE SAVINGS F.S.B.; 

HAWTHORNE FINANCIAL

CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. No. 03-55611

M. DIANE KOKEN, Insurance D.C. No.

Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,  CV-99-13119-DT

ORDER AND

in her capacity as Liquidator of AMENDED Reliance Insurance Company, OPINION Intervenor-Appellant,

RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF

ILLINOIS,

Defendant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dickran M. Tevrizian, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted December 6, 2004—Pasadena, California

629 630 HAWTHORNE SAVINGS v. RELIANCE INSURANCE Filed August 24, 2005 Amended January 13, 2006

Before: James R. Browning, Harry Pregerson, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.