Allen

Allen v. Ornoski

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 15, 200606-99001California8,199 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wardlaw, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CLARENCE RAY ALLEN, 

Petitioner-Appellant, Nos. 06-99001 v. 06-70206 STEVEN W. ORNOSKI, Warden, of the California State Prison at San  D.C. No.

CV-00064-FCD-

Quentin; ATTORNEY DAD

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

OPINION

CALIFORNIA,

Respondents-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Frank C. Damrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted and Filed January 15, 2006 Pasadena, California*

Before: Susan P. Graber, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Wardlaw

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

879 884 ALLEN v. ORNOSKI

COUNSEL

Michael Satris, Bolinas, California, for the appellant.

Ward A. Campbell, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for the appellee.

OPINION

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:

Clarence Ray Allen appeals from the district court’s order denying and dismissing in part his second…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.