United States v. Dennis Sittman

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 31, 201009-10302California271 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAR 31 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10302

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:91-cr-00921-ACK

v.

MEMORANDUM *

DENNIS J. SITTMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Alan C. Kay, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2010 **

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Dennis J. Sittman appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking a

previous term of supervised release and imposing a term of imprisonment and a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

SR/Research new term of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

Sittman contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to

explain its reasons for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.