Penuliar
Penuliar v. Ashcroft
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 200603-71578California4,826 words
Opinion
Opinion
Pregerson 810 PENULIAR v. GONZALES, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOPRING PAULINO PENULIAR, No. 03-71578 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A44-948-659 ALBERTO R. GONZALES,* Attorney ORDER General, AMENDING Respondent. OPINION AND DENYING
PETITION FOR
PANEL
REHEARING AND
PETITION FOR
REHEARING EN
BANC AND
AMENDED
OPINION
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted December 10, 2004—Pasadena, California
Filed January 12, 2005 Amended January 23, 2006
Before: James R. Browning, Harry Pregerson, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
*Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).
807 808 PENULIAR v. GONZALES Opinion by Judge Pregerson 810 PENULIAR v. GONZALES
COUNSEL
Melanie Jo Triebel, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Newport Beach, California, for the petitioner.
Nicole Nardone (argued) and Jennifer Paisner (briefed), Office of…