United States v. Clark

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 200604-30249California11,745 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-30249 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-03-00406-L

MICHAEL LEWIS CLARK,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 6, 2005—Seattle, Washington

Filed January 25, 2006

Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Warren J. Ferguson, and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge McKeown; Dissent by Judge Ferguson

999 1002 UNITED STATES v. CLARK

COUNSEL

Michael Filipovic, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Seattle, Washington, for the defendant-appellant.

John McKay, United States Attorney, Seattle, Washington; Helen J. Brunner, Assistant United States Attorney, Seattle, Washington; John J. Lulejian, Assistant United States Attor- ney, Seattle, Washington; Susan B. Dohrmann, Assistant United States Attorney, Seattle, Washington, for the plaintiff- appellee.

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal we are confronted with a question of first impression regarding the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.