Rausch

Reynolds v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

Good Law
435 F.3d 1081·2006 WL 171920
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 200603-35695, 04-35279California9,689 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), insurance companies are required to send adverse action notices to consumers whenever they increase the rates for insurance on the basis of information contained in consumer credit reports. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681a(k)(l)(B)(i), lbSlmta). The principal question before us is straightforward: Does FCRA’s adverse action notice requirement apply to the rate first charged in an initial policy of insurance? We hold that the answer is yes: The Act requires that an insurance company send the consumer an adverse action notice whenever a higher rate is charged because of credit information it obtains, regardless of whether the rate is contained in an initial policy or an extension or renewal of a policy and regardless of whether the company has previously charged the consumer a lower rate.

We also resolve five ancillary questions. First, we hold that FCRA’s adverse action notice requirement applies whenever a consumer would have received a lower rate for insurance had his credit information been more favorable, regardless of whether his credit rating is above or below average. Specifically, the requirement covers those whose credit information is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.