Corona Duarte v. Holder

Good Law
373 F. App'x 675
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 201007-71327California253 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Cecilia Corona Duarte, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying her application for a § 212(c) waiver. Our jurisdiction is gov erned by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, Saravia-Paguada v. Gonzales, 488 F.3d 1122 , 1129 n. 10 (9th Cir.2007), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Corona Duarte’s contention that there is insufficient evidence in the record to establish that she committed an offense that would render her ineligible for § 212(c) relief under § 440(d) of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”) because Corona Duarte failed to exhaust this issue before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677 (9th Cir.2004).

Although we have jurisdiction to review Corona Duarte’s contention that the application of § 440(d) of the AEDPA has an impermissibly retroactive effect in her case, see Saravia-P aguada, 488 F.3d at 1130 , her contention lacks merit because she was convicted after AEDPA’s effectivé date, id. at 1132-33 (the past relevant conduct…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.