Anaya-Fernandez

Anaya-Fernandez v. Holder

Good Law
375 F. App'x 680
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 201006-74313California419 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jorge Anaya-Fernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo constitutional questions and questions of law, Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency properly concluded that Anaya-Fernandez is ineligible for § 212(c) relief with respect to his 2001 convictions. See 8 C.F.R. § 1212.3 (h)(3) (“Section 212(c) relief is not available with respect to convictions arising from plea agreements made on or after April 1, 1997.”); see also United States v. Velasco-Medina, 305 F.3d 839, 850 (9th Cir.2002) (“To the extent [an alien] anticipated the continued availability of § 212(c) relief after [1996], his expectations were neither reasonable nor settled under [INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 [ 121 S.Ct. 2271 , 150 L.Ed.2d 347 ] (2001) ].”).

Anaya-Fernandez’s contention that the expanded aggravated felony definition contained in section 321 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.