Ladwig

United States v. Ladwig

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 200604-30393California198 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-30393 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-03-00232-RHW CRAIG ALLEN LADWIG,  Eastern District Defendant-Appellant. of Washington, Spokane

 ORDER

Filed January 27, 2006

Before: Ronald M. Gould and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges, and William W Schwarzer,* District Judge.

ORDER

In our opinion of December 27, 2005, we retained jurisdic- tion and directed the parties to provide supplemental briefing on whether either wished to pursue a limited remand under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). Because both parties have responded that they do not seek an Ameline remand, and other sentencing issues were resolved in our prior opinion, we now AFFIRM Ladwig’s sentence, and direct the Clerk to issue the mandate after the time for filing a Petition for Rehearing or Petition for Rehear- ing En Banc has expired.

*The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.