Russell
United States v. Russell
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 04-10681 v. D.C. No.
CR-04-00054-LKK
WILLIE RUSSELL, JR., a/k/a Wild Bill, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 15, 2005—San Francisco, California
Filed January 30, 2006
Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Sidney R. Thomas, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge O’Scannlain; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Thomas
1209 1212 UNITED STATES v. RUSSELL
COUNSEL
Quin Denvir, Federal Defender, Sacramento, California, argued the cause and was on the briefs for the appellant.
William S. Wong, Assistant United States Attorney, Sacra- mento, California, argued the cause for the appellee. McGre- gor W. Scott, United States Attorney, was on the brief.
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to consider whether the emergency doctrine or implied consent can support a warrantless…