Rivas

Rivas v. Ryan

Good Law
373 F. App'x 718
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 5, 201007-56165California385 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER WITHDRAWING MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

The memorandum disposition filed February 19, 2010 is withdrawn. A superseding memorandum disposition is being filed concurrently with this order.

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and to deny the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied. The panel will not entertain any additional petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc.

MEMORANDUM

Roy Rivas, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. Rivas argues he was denied a fair trial because the jury foreman lied during voir dire. He further argues he was deprived of a peremptory challenge because of the untruthful answers.

The California Court of Appeal did not unreasonably determine that the jury foreman, Rudy Medina, answered all questions on voir dire truthfully. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(2). Medina himself…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.