Rivas
Rivas v. Ryan
Opinion
Opinion
ORDER WITHDRAWING MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
The memorandum disposition filed February 19, 2010 is withdrawn. A superseding memorandum disposition is being filed concurrently with this order.
The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and to deny the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied. The panel will not entertain any additional petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc.
MEMORANDUM
Roy Rivas, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. Rivas argues he was denied a fair trial because the jury foreman lied during voir dire. He further argues he was deprived of a peremptory challenge because of the untruthful answers.
The California Court of Appeal did not unreasonably determine that the jury foreman, Rudy Medina, answered all questions on voir dire truthfully. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(2). Medina himself…