Maharaj

Maharaj v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 6, 200603-71066California185 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VINODH PARSAD MAHARAJ; SUNITA  No. 03-71066

DEVI MAHARAJ; PREETIKA MAHARAJ;

MEENAL MAHARAJ; VINEET Agency Nos.

MAHARAJ, A71-788-923

Petitioners,  A71-788-924

A72-402-323

v.

A72-402-324

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney A72-402-325 General, Respondent. 

VINODH PARSAD MAHARAJ; SUNITA  No. 03-73995

DEVI MAHARAJ; PREETIKA MAHARAJ;

MEENAL MAHARAJ; VINEET Agency Nos.

MAHARAJ, A71-788-923

Petitioners,  A71-788-924

A72-402-323

v.

A72-402-324

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney A72-402-325 General,

ORDER

Respondent.  Filed February 6, 2006

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by 1585 1586 MAHARAJ v. GONZALES the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.