Maharaj
Maharaj v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 6, 200603-71066California185 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VINODH PARSAD MAHARAJ; SUNITA No. 03-71066
DEVI MAHARAJ; PREETIKA MAHARAJ;
MEENAL MAHARAJ; VINEET Agency Nos.
MAHARAJ, A71-788-923
Petitioners, A71-788-924
A72-402-323
v.
A72-402-324
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney A72-402-325 General, Respondent.
VINODH PARSAD MAHARAJ; SUNITA No. 03-73995
DEVI MAHARAJ; PREETIKA MAHARAJ;
MEENAL MAHARAJ; VINEET Agency Nos.
MAHARAJ, A71-788-923
Petitioners, A71-788-924
A72-402-323
v.
A72-402-324
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney A72-402-325 General,
ORDER
Respondent. Filed February 6, 2006
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by 1585 1586 MAHARAJ v. GONZALES the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of…