Olympic Pipeline v. City of Seattle
Opinion
Opinion
Gould, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OLYMPIC PIPE LINE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, No. 04-35307 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CV-03-02343-RSL
CITY OF SEATTLE, a Washington
OPINION
municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 14, 2005—Seattle, Washington
Filed February 8, 2006
Before: Harry Pregerson, Susan P. Graber, and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Gould
1487 1490 OLYMPIC PIPE LINE v. CITY OF SEATTLE
COUNSEL
William H. Patton, City of Seattle, Seattle, Washington, for the defendant-appellant.
G. Val Tollefson and Katherine Kennedy, Danielson Harrigan Leyh & Tollefson LLP, Seattle, Washington, for the plaintiff- appellee.
Kevin Hawley, Lima, Ohio, for the amicus.
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the City of Seattle (“Seattle” or “the City”) can enforce specific provisions of two contracts it has with the Olympic Pipe Line Company (“Olympic”) to provide safety oversight of a…