Shegow

Shegow v. Holder

Good Law
373 F. App'x 816
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 201007-71785California266 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Muna Mohamed Shegow, a native and citizen of Somalia, and Salma Abdulkadir Omar, a native of Kenya and citizen of Somalia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their motion to reopen deportation proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and de novo claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We grant the petition for review, and remand.

Although Petitioners’ motion to reopen was filed outside the 180-day period for motions to reopen due to “exceptional circumstances,” that period may be equitably tolled by a showing of ineffective or deceptive legal representation. See Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 272 F.3d 1176, 1193 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc). Here, the IJ rejected Petitioners’ ineffective assistance claim against attorney Leposki on the grounds that Leposki failed to file a notice of appearance with the immigration court. We remand for the IJ to consider Petitioners’ evidence that they had in fact hired Lepo-ski to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.