Doe

Doe v. Kamehameha

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 200604-15044California237 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN DOE, a minor, by his mother  and next friend, Jane Doe nfr Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Appellant, and

JOSEPHINE HELELANI PAUAHI

RABAGO,

Intervenor, v.

KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS/BERNICE

PAUAHI BISHOP ESTATE; CONSTANCE

LAU, in her capacity as Trustee of No. 04-15044 the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate; NAINOA THOMPSON, in his capacity as  D.C. No.

CV-03-00316-ACK

Trustee of the Kamehameha ORDER Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate; DIANE J. PLOTTS, in her capacity as Trustee of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate; ROBERT K.U. KIHUNE, in his capacity as Trustee of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate; J. DOUGLAS ING, in his capacity as Trustee of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate, Defendants-Appellees. 

2029 2030 DOE v. KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS Filed February 22, 2006

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.