United States v. Miguel Bravo-Romero

Good Law
376 F. App'x 754
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 201009-50311California357 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 19 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50311

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:08-cr-02411-BTM

v.

MEMORANDUM *

MIGUEL BRAVO-ROMERO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2010 **

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Miguel Bravo-Romero appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bravo-Romero contends that the sentence is unreasonable because the

district court failed to consider an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.