United States v. Williams
Opinion
Opinion
Graber, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-30071 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CR-03-60104-HO
JOHN ANTHONY WILLIAMS,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael R. Hogan, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 12, 2006—Portland, Oregon
Filed March 21, 2006
Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Graber
2969 2972 UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS
COUNSEL
Ruben L. Iniguez, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Port- land, Oregon, for the defendant-appellant.
Christopher L. Cardani, Assistant United States Attorney, Eugene, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellee.
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Defendant John Anthony Williams appeals his conviction and sentence for mail and wire fraud and money laundering. UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS 2973 His main argument is that the government improperly charged him under an “intangible rights” theory of mail and wire fraud, because that theory does not apply to private…