Canales-Vargas

Canales-Vargas v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 200603-71737California5,916 words

Opinion

Opinion

PREGERSON, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JACQUELINE CANALES-VARGAS, 

Petitioner, No. 03-71737 v.  Agency No.

A72-136-915

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,* Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 9, 2004** San Francisco, California

Filed March 21, 2006

Before: Harry Pregerson, Alex Kozinski, and Michael Daly Hawkins, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Pregerson; Dissent by Judge Kozinski

*Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). **This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). COUNSEL

Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo, San Francisco, California, for the petitioner.

Victor M. Lawrence, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

OPINION

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

An Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denied Petitioner Jacqueline…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.