Cir
Johnson v. Cir
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 200604-72322California3,468 words
Opinion
Opinion
Alarcón, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STANLEY T. JOHNSON; CONSTANCE
JOHNSON,
No. 04-72322 Petitioners-Appellants, v. Tax Ct. No. 7415-
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
OPINION
REVENUE,
Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court
Argued and Submitted February 15, 2006—San Francisco, California
Filed March 28, 2006
Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Arthur L. Alarcón, and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Alarcón
3381 3384 JOHNSON v. CIR
COUNSEL
Heidi Parry Stern, Beckley Singleton, Chtd., Las Vegas, Nevada, for the petitioners-appellants.
John Schumann, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, DC, for the respondent-appellee.
OPINION
ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge:
Stanley T. Johnson and his present wife, Constance John- son (“Appellants”), appeal from the United States Tax Court’s decision that there is a deficiency in income tax due from them for the taxable year 1997. The court has jurisdiction pur- suant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482. The gravamen of Appellants’ argu- ment is that Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.”) § 71, as amended in…