Bridgeforth

United States v. Bridgeforth

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 200604-50183California3,842 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

This case arises out of two drug transactions observed and recorded by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). On August 20, 1999, Deshonda Aldridge, a paid infor- mant for the FBI, drove to the 1800 block of East Pine Street in Compton, California, to purchase an ounce of crack cocaine. Aldridge was looking for a man named Steven Rhodes, with whom she had conducted narcotics transactions in the past. While Aldridge was unable to find Rhodes, she did happen upon Ronald Daniels, who offered to sell her the 3548 UNITED STATES v. BRIDGEFORTH crack. Daniels, an apparent middleman, did not have the drugs that Aldridge requested. Daniels paged his supplier and, when Bridgeforth showed up on his motorcycle, Daniels told Aldridge, “There he go right here.” Bridgeforth rode his motorcycle to the driver’s side of Aldridge’s car while Dan- iels was leaning on the passenger-side door. Aldridge gave Daniels $540 for the crack. After Aldridge paid for the drugs, she claimed that Daniels handed the money to Bridgeforth. Daniels and Bridgeforth then left Aldridge for a time. A sur- veillance agent saw Bridgeforth lead Daniels toward the back of Daniels’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.