Mix

United States v. Mix

Good Law
442 F.3d 1191·2006 WL 802535·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 7789
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 30, 200605-10088California3,192 words

Opinion

Opinion

Alarcon, J.

Tony Mix was convicted of two counts of kidnaping, five counts of aggravated sexual abuse, and two counts of assault with a deadly weapon committed within the confines of the Navajo Indian Reservation. He appeals from the district court’s sentencing decision. He contends that the imposition of a life sentence was unreasonable and inconsistent with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). He also maintains that the district court’s application of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), in its sentencing decision violated his rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments of the United States Constitution.

We affirm because the sentence imposed by the district court was reasonable. We also hold that the district court’s application of Booker to its sentencing decision did not violate Mr. Mix’s rights under the Due Process clause of the Fifth Amendment, nor did the district court violate the Sixth Amendment in failing to submit sentence enhancing factors to the jury.

I

A

The evidence presented by the prosecution at trial demonstrated that Mr. Mix committed numerous violent acts of sexual and physical assault…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.