Casey
United States v. Casey
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 200604-30525California3,192 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 04-30525 v. D.C. No.
MICHAEL DAVID CASEY, CR-03-00049-AJB
Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-30016 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.C. No.
CR-03-00049-AJB
MICHAEL DAVID CASEY,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 7, 2005—Portland, Oregon
Filed April 10, 2006
Before: James R. Browning, Dorothy W. Nelson, and Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge O’Scannlain
3941 3944 UNITED STATES v. CASEY
COUNSEL
Nancy Bergeson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Portland, Oregon, argued the cause for the petitioner and was on the briefs.
Jennifer J. Martin, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, Oregon, argued the cause for the respondent; Karin J. Immer- gut, United States Attorney, Portland, Oregon, was on the briefs.