Raj Kumar v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 200603-70191California9,256 words

Opinion

Opinion

REINHARDT, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAJ KUMAR, 

Petitioner, No. 03-70191 v.  Agency No. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney A75-579-218 General, Respondent. 

RAJ KUMAR,  No. 03-73449 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A75-579-218 ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney  ORDER AND General, AMENDED Respondent. OPINION AND

AMENDED

 DISSENT

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted July 12, 2005—Pasadena, California

Filed January 23, 2006 Amended April 13, 2006

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Alex Kozinski, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Reinhardt; Dissent by Judge Kozinski COUNSEL

Garish Sarin, Law Offices of Garish Sarin, Los Angeles, Cali- fornia, for the petitioner.

Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; Linda S. Wendt- land, Assistant Director; John S. Hogan, Office of Immigra- tion Litigation, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

ORDER

The majority opinion filed January 23, 2006, slip op.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.