Stewart

Williams v. Stewart

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 200601-99015California15,854 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD TURNEY WILLIAMS,  No. 01-99015 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. TERRY L. STEWART, Director of  CV 95-01687-RCB

ORDER AND

Arizona Department of

AMENDED

Corrections,

OPINION

Respondent-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Robert C. Broomfield, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 17, 2005—San Francisco, California

Filed March 28, 2006 Amended April 18, 2006

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Pamela Ann Rymer and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion COUNSEL

Julie S. Hall, Tucson, Arizona, and Denise I. Young, Tucson, Arizona, for petitioner-appellant Ronald Turney Williams.

Terry Goddard, Attorney General, Phoenix Arizona, Kent E. Cattani, Chief Counsel, Capital Litigation Section, Phoenix, Arizona, and John Pressley Todd, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Arizona, for respondents-appellees Terry L. Stewart, et al.

ORDER

The opinion filed on March 28, 2006, is AMENDED by deleting the last sentence of the first paragraph and replacing it with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.