Mendez-Guitirrez

Mendez-Guitirrez v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 200604-72525California2,216 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace COUNSEL, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZEFERINO MENDEZ-GUTIERREZ, 

Petitioner, No. 04-72525 v.  Agency No.

A75-301-863

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 15, 2006—San Francisco, California

Filed April 17, 2006

Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Michael Daly Hawkins, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Wallace COUNSEL

Jonathan M. Kaufman, San Francisco, California, for the peti- tioner.

Peter D. Keisler, Linda S. Wendtland, Shelley R. Goad, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

OPINION

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Zeferino Mendez-Gutierrez petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (Board) denial of his motion to reinstate his asylum application. The Board found that Mendez-Gutierrez had not established a prima facie case for asylum based on a well-founded fear of future persecution. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a). We deny the petition for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.