Huerta-Pimentel

United States v. Huerta-Pimentel

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 24, 200604-50037California2,726 words

Opinion

Opinion

Paez, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 04-50037 v.  D.C. No.

CR-97-03128-NAJ

LAZARO HUERTA-PIMENTAL, aka Jose Huerta, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Napoleon A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 12, 2006* Pasadena, California

Filed April 24, 2006

Before: Harry Pregerson, A. Wallace Tashima, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Paez

*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

4565 4568 UNITED STATES v. HUERTA-PIMENTAL

COUNSEL

Angela M. Krueger, Steven F. Hubachek, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, California, for the defendant- appellant.

Carol C. Lam, United States Attorney, Joseph H. Huynh, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

Huerta-Pimental appeals the revocation of his term of supervised release and the subsequent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.