Amerisourcebergen Corp. v. Dialysist West, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 24, 200604-15595California282 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION, 

a New Jersey corporation, dba Bergen Brunswig Corporation, aka

BBC; AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG

CORPORATION; MEDICAL INITIATIVES,

INC., aka Oncology Supply; ASD No. 04-15595

SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No.

CV-02-01472-JWS

v. DIALYSIST WEST, INC., an Arizona  District of Arizona, Phoenix corporation, ORDER Defendant-Appellee, AMENDING v. OPINION AMERX INC., a Florida corporation; CSG DISTRIBUTORS, a Tennessee company; PREMIER MEDICAL

DISTRIBUTORS, INC.,

Third-party-Defendants.  Filed April 24, 2006

Before: Jerome Farris, A. Wallace Tashima, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed on March 22, 2006 is amended as fol- lows: on slip opinion page 3046, lines 10-16, the following sentences are deleted: “AmerisourceBergen contends, how- ever that the contracts for sale of Epogen and other drugs

4563 4564 AMERISOURCEBERGEN v. DIALYSIST WEST were not separate contracts. Because the Vendor Agreement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.