Arreola
United States v. Arreola
Opinion
Opinion
Thomas, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 04-10504 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CR-01-40120-DLJ
JOSE ARREOLA,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California D. Lowell Jensen, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 16, 2006—San Francisco, California
Filed April 26, 2006
Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Michael Daly Hawkins, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Thomas
4727 4730 UNITED STATES v. ARREOLA
COUNSEL
Marc J. Zilversmit, San Francisco, California, for appellant Arreola.
Deborah R. Douglas, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, for appellee United States.
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we consider whether in using the phrases “possesses” and “uses or carries,” 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) UNITED STATES v. ARREOLA 4731 defines two offenses or two means of committing a single offense. We conclude that the statute defines one offense, and affirm the judgment of the district court.