Jensen

Jensen v. Pliler

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 200604-55840California2,438 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson COUNSEL, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEF MICHAEL JENSEN,  No. 04-55840 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-03-01110-JVS CHERYL K. PLILER, Warden,  ORDER Respondent-Appellee. AMENDING

OPINION AND

AMENDED

 OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 7, 2006—Pasadena, California

Filed March 9, 2006 Amended April 27, 2006

Before: David R. Thompson, Thomas G. Nelson, and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Thompson COUNSEL

David J. Zugman, San Diego, California, for the petitioner- appellant.

Scott C. Taylor, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, California, for the respondent-appellee. 4796 JENSEN v. PLILER

ORDER

The Opinion, Jensen v. Pliler, No. 04-55840, slip op. 2413 (9th Cir. Mar. 9, 2006), is amended by deleting from footnote 3 at slip op. 2421, the following sentence: “However, we need not decide here whether Crawford applies retroactively.” Inserted in place…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.