Aguiluz-Arellano

Aguiluz-Arellano v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 200603-73856California1,974 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VACILIO AGUILUZ-ARELLANO, 

Petitioner, No. 03-73856 v.  Agency No.

A92-002-534

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 9, 2006* Pasadena, California

Filed May 1, 2006

Before: David R. Thompson and Thomas G. Nelson, Senior Circuit Judges, and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judge.

Opinion by Judge Gould

*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). COUNSEL

Dario Aguirre, San Diego, California, for petitioner Vacilio Aguiluz-Arellano.

Lyle D. Jentzer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent Alberto Gonzales. 4970 AGUILUZ-ARELLANO v. GONZALES

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Vacilio Aguiluz-Arellano petitions for review of a final removal order, arguing that the BIA erred in finding that Aguiluz-Arellano’s conviction for being under the influence of a controlled substance did not fall within the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.