Pintado-Isiordia

United States v. Pintado-Isiordia

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 200605-50489California992 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-50489 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-04-01535-BTM

GUILLERMO PINTADO-ISIORDIA,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 5, 2006—Pasadena, California

Filed May 26, 2006

Before: Donald P. Lay,* Barry G. Silverman, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

*The Honorable Donald P. Lay, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

5845 5848 UNITED STATES v. PINTADO-ISIORDIA

COUNSEL

Kenneth J. Troiano, San Diego, California, for the appellant.

Carol C. Lam, United States Attorney; Roger W. Haines, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Chief, Appellate Section, Criminal Division; Kara A. Sandoval, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, California, for the appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Pintado-Isiordia appeals from his conviction and sentence for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We affirm in part,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.