Amalgamated Transit Union v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 200605-56567California4,997 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION 

LOCAL 1309, AFL-CIO; SELMA

No. 05-56567

SHACKLEFORD; GREGORY PASSMORE;

RONALD G. DUNCAN; TIMOTHY D.C. No.

THURMANN; SAMUEL J. FRANK; CV 05-1199 IEG

ALEXANDER BRADLEY; MICHELE L. SD Cal.

BOSWELL; JOHN A. TAYLOR; ORDER

TERRENCE SANDIDGE; KUNIYUKI

KASHIUAGI; GWENAIDA COLE; LELA  AMENDING

DISSENT FROM

SHIPMAN; SHARON K. HARRIS; FABIS THE DENIAL OF

HORTON III; PHILIP BINGHAM, REHEARING

Plaintiffs-Appellants, EN BANC AND v. ORDER AND

AMENDED

LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INC.;

DISSENT

FIRST TRANSIT, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.  Filed May 22, 2006 Amended May 31, 2006

Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, A. Wallace Tashima, and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.

Order; Dissent by Judge Bybee

ORDER

The dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc, filed on May 22, 2006, is amended as follows:

5893 5894 AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION v. LAIDLAW TRANSIT 1. In the dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc, slip opinion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.