Amalgamated Transit Union v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 200605-56567California4,997 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION
LOCAL 1309, AFL-CIO; SELMA
No. 05-56567
SHACKLEFORD; GREGORY PASSMORE;
RONALD G. DUNCAN; TIMOTHY D.C. No.
THURMANN; SAMUEL J. FRANK; CV 05-1199 IEG
ALEXANDER BRADLEY; MICHELE L. SD Cal.
BOSWELL; JOHN A. TAYLOR; ORDER
TERRENCE SANDIDGE; KUNIYUKI
KASHIUAGI; GWENAIDA COLE; LELA AMENDING
DISSENT FROM
SHIPMAN; SHARON K. HARRIS; FABIS THE DENIAL OF
HORTON III; PHILIP BINGHAM, REHEARING
Plaintiffs-Appellants, EN BANC AND v. ORDER AND
AMENDED
LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INC.;
DISSENT
FIRST TRANSIT, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees. Filed May 22, 2006 Amended May 31, 2006
Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, A. Wallace Tashima, and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.
Order; Dissent by Judge Bybee
ORDER
The dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc, filed on May 22, 2006, is amended as follows:
5893 5894 AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION v. LAIDLAW TRANSIT 1. In the dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc, slip opinion…