Synclair

Synclair v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 1, 200603-16910California179 words

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LARRY SYNCLAIR, SR., individually  and as a parent of Larry Synclair, Jr., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 03-16910 v. COUNTY OF FRESNO; DEPARTMENT OF  D.C. No.

CV-01-06546-AWI

CHILD ABDUCTION UNIT; WILLIAM

ORDER

FRANK; RON HOPPER; DENNIS

LEWIS; EDWARD HUNT;

KATHY MACKIE,

Defendants-Appellees.  On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed June 2, 2006

Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, J. Clifford Wallace, and Stephen S. Trott, Circuit Judges

ORDER

On petition for writ of certiorari, the United States Supreme Court vacated and remanded the memorandum disposition “for further consideration in light of Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 544 U.S. [280], 125 S.Ct. 1517, 161 L.Ed2d 454 (2005).” Synclair v. County of Fresno, 126 S.Ct. 731 (Nov. 28, 2005).

We remand to the district court for further proceedings con- sistent with the direction of the Supreme Court.

6013

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.