Mendoza
Mendoza v. Carey
Opinion
Opinion
TASHIMA, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARLOS MENDOZA, No. 04-56733 Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.C. No.
CV 04-02632 CJC
TOM L. CAREY, Warden,
OPINION
Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 17, 2005—Pasadena, California
Filed June 7, 2006
Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, A. Wallace Tashima, and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Tashima; Dissent by Judge Kleinfeld
6233 6236 MENDOZA v. CAREY
COUNSEL
Stephen M. Lathrop, Rolling Hills Estates, California, for the petitioner-appellant.
Keith H. Borjon, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, Cal- ifornia, for the respondent-appellee.
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Carlos Mendoza, a California state prisoner, appeals from the judgment of the district court, which dismissed as untimely his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Under the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 MENDOZA v. CAREY 6237 (“AEDPA”), habeas petitions must be…