Ortega-Mendez

Ortega-Mendez v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 200603-74711California6,035 words

Opinion

Opinion

Berzon, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERTO ORTEGA-MENDEZ, 

Petitioner, No. 03-74711 v.  Agency No.

A76-345-757

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,* Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 6, 2006—San Francisco, California

Filed June 15, 2006

Before: David R. Thompson, Marsha S. Berzon, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Berzon

*Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2).

6623 6626 ORTEGA-MENDEZ v. GONZALES

COUNSEL

James F. Smith, Davis, California, and Christopher J. Todd, Mill Valley, California, for the petitioner.

Alison R. Drucker and Margaret J. Perry, Office of Immigra- tion Litigation, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent. ORTEGA-MENDEZ v. GONZALES 6627

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

An Immigration Judge (IJ) determined that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.