Hulteen

Hulteen v. At&t

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 200604-16087California149 words

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOREEN HULTEEN; ELEANORA 

COLLET, ARMA HORTON; ELIZABETH

SNYDER; COMMUNICATIONS No. 04-16087

WORKERS OF AMERICA,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,  D.C. No.

CV-01-01122-MJJ

v. ORDER

AT&T CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.  Filed July 19, 2006

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1 Judges Kleinfeld and Rawlinson are recused.

8289

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.