Nrc

Nuclear Information & Resource Service v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Good Law
457 F.3d 941·2006 WL 2042893·62 ERC (BNA) 1934·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18477
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 24, 200604-71432California6,059 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rymer, J.

The Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Committee to Bridge the Gap, Public Citizen, Inc., and Redwood Alliance (collectively NIRS) challenge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) rulemak-ing, which revised regulations governing the exemption standards for the transportation of radioactive material. NIRS argues that NRC failed to comply with its obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4332 , by not preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and making a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) without basis. We are obligated before reaching the merits of NIRS’s NEPA challenge to determine whether NIRS has standing to bring its complaint in federal court. We conclude that it does not, and we therefore dismiss NIRS’s petition for review.

I

NRC and the Department of Transportation (DOT) co-regulate the transporta tion of radioactive material in the United States. NRC is authorized to regulate the use and possession of nuclear materials, which it does by prescribing regulations for its licensees’ packaging and transport of such materials. See 42 U.S.C. § 2201 (b); 10 C.F.R. § 71.0 . DOT is authorized to designate material as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.