Widmark

Widmark v. Barnhart

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 200604-35952California4,157 words

Opinion

Opinion

BROWNING, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STERLING WIDMARK, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 04-35952 v.  D.C. No.

CV-03-01057-JMS

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Janice M. Stewart, Magistrate, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2005* Portland, Oregon

Filed July 26, 2006

Before: James R. Browning, Dorothy W. Nelson, and Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Browning; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge O’Scannlain

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

8369 8372 WIDMARK v. BARNHART

COUNSEL

Tim Wilborn, West Linn, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Karin J. Immergut, United States Attorney, Craig J. Casey, Assistant United States Attorney, Lucille Gonzales Meis, Region X WIDMARK v. BARNHART 8373 Chief Counsel, Stephanie R. Martz, Assistant Regional Coun- sel, Seattle,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.