Myron

Myron v. Tehrune

Good Law
457 F.3d 996·2006 WL 2242352·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20129
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 7, 200604-15770California1,215 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace, J.

James Myron appeals from the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prison condition claims. Myron argues that state regulations governing prison administration create enforceable Fourteenth Amendment liberty interests, and that dismissal on that basis was therefore erroneous. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

I.

Myron, a California state prisoner, filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action along with other plaintiffs in December 1999. The complaint named several correctional officers and medical personnel at the Salinas Valley State Prison as defendants. The district court, after conducting its mandatory sua sponte review of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, dismissed most of plaintiffs’ claims. In doing so, the district court held that prison regulations governing inmate classification, prison publications, and law library access did not create cognizable Fourteenth Amendment liberty interests. Myron takes this appeal alone, arguing that these determinations were erroneous.

II.

Each of Myron’s claims depends on the existence of a federal liberty interest. We review the district court’s determina tion that no such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.