Northern California River Watch v. City of Healdsburg

Good Law
457 F.3d 1023·2006 WL 2291155·36 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20163·62 ERC (BNA) 2089·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20531
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 10, 200604-15442California4,199 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schroeder, J.

Defendant/Appellant City of Healdsburg (“Healdsburg”) appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Plaintiff/Appellee Northern California River Watch (“River Watch”), an environmental group, in this litigation under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). Plaintiff alleges that Healds-burg, without first obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit, violated the CWA by discharging sewage from its waste treatment plant into waters covered by the Act. Healdsburg discharged the sewage into a body of water known as “Basalt Pond,” a rock quarry pit that had filled with water from the surrounding aquifer, located next to the Russian River.

The issue is whether Basalt Pond is subject to the CWA because the Pond contains wetlands adjacent to a navigable river of the United States. The district court held that discharges into the Pond are discharges into the Russian River, a navigable water of the United States protected by the CWA. The court followed the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc., 474 U.S. 121 , 106 S.Ct. 455 , 88 L.Ed.2d 419 (1985).

The Supreme Court, however, has now narrowed the scope of that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.