Suntharalinkam
Suntharalinkam v. Gonzales
Opinion
Opinion
WARDLAW, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARANGESAN SUNTHARALINKAM,
Petitioner, No. 04-70258 v. Agency No.
A79-784-825
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted March 10, 2006—Pasadena, California
Filed August 18, 2006
Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges, and Richard F. Cebull,* District Judge.
Opinion by Judge Wardlaw; Dissent by Judge Rawlinson
*The Honorable Richard F. Cebull, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. COUNSEL
Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran, Law Office of Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran, New York, New York, for the petitioner.
Genevieve Holm (argued) and Cynthia Stone (briefed), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litiga- tion, Washington, D.C., for the respondent. Also on brief for the respondent, Lester M. Joseph and Michael E. Davitt, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Criminal Division, Washington, D.C.