Covian-Sandoval

United States v. Covian-Sandoval

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 200605-50543California4,322 words

Opinion

Opinion

D.W. Nelson, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-50543 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-05-00292-DMS

JOSE COVIAN-SANDOVAL,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 5, 2006* Pasadena, California

Filed August 31, 2006

Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Michael Daly Hawkins, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge D.W. Nelson

*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

10597 UNITED STATES v. COVIAN-SANDOVAL 10601

COUNSEL

David J. Zugman, San Diego, California, for the defendant- appellant.

Carol C. Lam, Roger W. Haines, Jr., and Stacey H. Sullivan, San Diego, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge:

Jose Covian-Sandoval (“Covian”) appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted illegal entry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Covian contends that the district court’s plea colloquy was inadequate under Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.