Yee

Yee v. Duncan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 11, 200605-55265California3,987 words

Opinion

Opinion

Trott, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDALL ALLAN YEE,  No. 05-55265 Petitioner-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CV-03-01764-LGB BILL DUNCAN, Warden,  ORDER Respondent-Appellant. WITHDRAWING

OPINION AND

 OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Lourdes G. Baird, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 9, 2006* Pasadena, California

Filed September 11, 2006

Before: Alex Kozinski, Stephen S. Trott, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Trott

*This case was submitted for decision without oral argument.

11039 11042 YEE v. DUNCAN

COUNSEL

Barry J.T. Carlton, Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, Cal- ifornia, for the respondent-appellant.

Randall Allan Yee, Pro Se, San Luis Obispo, California, for the petitioner-appellee.

ORDER

The Opinion filed on March 28, 2006, and reported at 441 F.3d 851 (9th Cir. 2006), is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit.

With this action, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.