Julian Reynoso v. James Hall
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 7, 201008-15800California6,439 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
SEP 07 2010
CORRECTED November 2, 2010 õ MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. C OU RT OF A PPEALS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JULIAN JESUS REYNOSO; JOHN PAUL No. 08-15800
REYNOSO,
D.C. No. 1:04-CV-05025-LJO-DLB Petitioners-Appellants,
v. MEMORANDUM *
JAMES E. HALL; G.J. GIURBINO,
Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O'Neill, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 7, 2009 San Francisco, California
Before: SCHROEDER and LUCERO,** and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges,. õ
ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Carlos F. Lucero, Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. Julian and John Reynoso appeal from the district court's order denying their petition
for a writ of habeas corpus. This court certified for appeal the issue of 'whether the
prosecutor violated [the Reynosos']…