Julian Reynoso v. James Hall

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 7, 201008-15800California6,439 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

SEP 07 2010

CORRECTED November 2, 2010 õ MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. C OU RT OF A PPEALS

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIAN JESUS REYNOSO; JOHN PAUL No. 08-15800

REYNOSO,

D.C. No. 1:04-CV-05025-LJO-DLB Petitioners-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM *

JAMES E. HALL; G.J. GIURBINO,

Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O'Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 7, 2009 San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER and LUCERO,** and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges,. õ

ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Carlos F. Lucero, Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. Julian and John Reynoso appeal from the district court's order denying their petition

for a writ of habeas corpus. This court certified for appeal the issue of 'whether the

prosecutor violated [the Reynosos']…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.