Silver

Silver v. Executive Car Leasing

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 6, 200604-55747California4,637 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Since 1974, Executive Car Leasing has provided coverage for its employees under a long-term disability insurance pol- icy (“Policy”). The Policy is administered by UNUM and governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. It provides benefits to Executive Car Leasing employees who suffer a loss of earn- ings due to disability. To qualify as disabled under the Policy, a claimant must demonstrate that “because of injury or sick- ness . . . [he] cannot perform each of the material duties of his regular occupation.” Also, because the Policy covers only long-term disabilities, it establishes a 90-day “elimination period,” during which time no benefits are payable. Thus, to receive benefits under the UNUM Policy, a claimant must establish not only that he is disabled, but also that he is dis- abled continuously for 90 days following the initial date on which he claims disability. If the claimant fails to show that he is continuously disabled throughout this elimination period and does not return to work after those 90 days, coverage under the Policy terminates.

Silver, an Executive Car Leasing employee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.