Freitag

Freitag v. Ayers

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 200603-16702California10,240 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt 18116 FREITAG v. AYERS, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEANNA L. FREITAG, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

ROBERT J. AYERS, JR.; TERESA

SCHWARTZ; AUGUSTINE LOPEZ; No. 03-16702

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,  D.C. No.

CV-00-02278-TEH

Defendants-Appellants, and

DAVID A. CARMICHAEL; G.

RODMAN; PAUL DILLARD; BARRY

O’NEILL; GEORGE NEOTTI,

Defendants. 

18111 18112 FREITAG v. AYERS

DEANNA L. FREITAG, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

ROBERT J. AYERS, JR.; TERESA

SCHWARTZ; AUGUSTINE LOPEZ; No. 03-17184

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,  D.C. No.

CV-00-02278-TEH

Defendants-Appellants, and

DAVID A. CARMICHAEL; G.

RODMAN; PAUL DILLARD; BARRY

O’NEILL; GEORGE NEOTTI,

Defendants. 

DEANNA L. FREITAG, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 03-17398

ROBERT J. AYERS, JR.; TERESA

D.C. No.

SCHWARTZ; AUGUSTINE LOPEZ;

CV-00-02278-TEH

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,  ORDER

Defendants-Appellants, AMENDING

OPINION AND

and

AMENDED

DAVID A. CARMICHAEL;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.