Freitag
Freitag v. Ayers
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 200603-16702California10,240 words
Opinion
Opinion
Reinhardt 18116 FREITAG v. AYERS, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DEANNA L. FREITAG,
Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
ROBERT J. AYERS, JR.; TERESA
SCHWARTZ; AUGUSTINE LOPEZ; No. 03-16702
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, D.C. No.
CV-00-02278-TEH
Defendants-Appellants, and
DAVID A. CARMICHAEL; G.
RODMAN; PAUL DILLARD; BARRY
O’NEILL; GEORGE NEOTTI,
Defendants.
18111 18112 FREITAG v. AYERS
DEANNA L. FREITAG,
Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
ROBERT J. AYERS, JR.; TERESA
SCHWARTZ; AUGUSTINE LOPEZ; No. 03-17184
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, D.C. No.
CV-00-02278-TEH
Defendants-Appellants, and
DAVID A. CARMICHAEL; G.
RODMAN; PAUL DILLARD; BARRY
O’NEILL; GEORGE NEOTTI,
Defendants.
DEANNA L. FREITAG,
Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 03-17398
ROBERT J. AYERS, JR.; TERESA
D.C. No.
SCHWARTZ; AUGUSTINE LOPEZ;
CV-00-02278-TEH
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ORDER
Defendants-Appellants, AMENDING
OPINION AND
and