Derham-Burk

Law Office of David a Boone v. Derham-Burk

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 200603-16814California5,522 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. Factual Background

On January 18, 2001, Filiae and Judy Eliapo (“the Eliapos”) hired Boone to assist them in filing for bankruptcy. On January 22, Boone filed a Chapter 13 petition on their 18498 IN RE: ELIAPO behalf. A plan was first filed on February 2. The plan was amended and re-filed on April 10. The plan was amended a second time and re-filed on April 18.

On May 30, Boone signed a one-page application for attor- ney’s fees under the bankruptcy court’s no-look guidelines, reproduced infra, in the amount of $2,350. This figure included $1,400 for the “basic case,” $750 because the case “involve[d] real property claims,” and $200 because the case “involve[d] vehicle loans or leases.” The bankruptcy court approved the Eliapos’ second amended plan on June 21 and approved Boone’s $2,350 no-look fee application on the same day.

On February 27, 2002, Boone filed a second fee application requesting an additional $1,248. This application included time sheets describing the tasks performed and hours spent by Boone. Boone had already been provided compensation, pur- suant to his no-look application, for some of the work described in the time sheets. Boone did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.