Lazarenko

United States v. Lazarenko

Good Law
469 F.3d 815·2006 WL 3360489
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 200606-10273California4,582 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tallman, J.

This unusual appeal follows the government’s seizure of approximately $2.5 million in assets from former Ukrainian Prime Minister Pavel Ivanovich Lazarenko (“Lazarenko”). A jury in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California convicted Lazarenko on several counts of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 . The United States contends that it seized the funds and bonds lawfully under criminal forfeiture law. See 18 U.S.C. § 982 (a)(1); 21 U.S.C. § 853 . Lazarenko has been sentenced, but has not yet appealed his conviction. The United States maintains that Lazarenko and a business associate purchased a majority share of an off-shore bank, European Federal Credit Bank (“Eurofed”), to launder the proceeds of illegal activity. Lazarenko and others would deposit the money in a San Francisco bank, which had a correspondent relationship with the off-shore Eurofed bank in Antigua. Third-party claimants include two PricewaterhouseCoopers partners appointed as Liquidators of Eurofed (“Liquidators”). They contend that they own the forfeited funds and bonds pursuant to an order from the High Court of Antigua appointing them to collect and distribute the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.