United States v. Ricardo Cruzagosto

Good Law
399 F. App'x 251
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 12, 201008-30474California102 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Ricardo Cruzagosto appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) motion for sentence reduction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Cruzagosto contends that the district court erred when it failed to lower his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) following the United States Sentencing Commission’s adoption of Amendment 706. We affirm in light of Dillon v. United States, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 2683 , 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.